QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 27, no. 4 (2008): 1028
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1028
© 2008 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * How Would Obama, McCain Cover The Uninsured?
 * Debating Cost Of Uninsured
 * Try Medicare-For-All
 * HA Blog Top 10
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* International Issues
* Pharmaceuticals
* Research And Technology

Biotech & Drugs

PROLOGUE

Biotechnology And Drugs


The rise of global trade presents new opportunities and pitfalls for many once-poor nations largely denied economic prosperity in the past. They now compete for overseas markets in industrialized countries—and consumers in those countries benefit from lower prices. But globalization typically has a darker side as well. Both sides of the story are evident in the pharmaceutical industries of China and India.

For years these countries have been leaders in the low-cost production of both active pharmaceutical ingredients and the fillers that go into medicines. In China, there are now more than 5,000 companies manufacturing low-cost drugs for domestic and international consumption. What’s more, with overseas markets booming, nearly half of all drugs consumed worldwide can trace their origins to components produced in China. The drive to maintain these markets can create powerful incentives to cut costs at the expense of quality. In the wake of widely reported deaths from tainted Chinese products, such as the recent case of heparin, foreign purchasers’ trust in the entire industry has waned.

In India, globalization has brought different temptations. Following on the heels of that nation’s success with production of generics, its pharmaceutical producers have now turned to accelerated development of innovative and patented molecular compounds and biologics. These lucrative products offer higher returns and the opportunity to compete head to head with European producers. Yet there are concerns that Indian manufacturers may now lack sufficient incentive to produce low-cost generic varieties of drugs for diseases that disproportionately burden poor people, both in India and around the world.

The papers that follow address these dilemmas. Sarah Frew, Hannah Kettler, and Peter Singer of the University of Toronto and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation offer a vision of a biotech marketplace that rewards innovative companies that continue to tackle diseases affecting the poor. But such a marketplace, they write, will require special incentives and "intentional policies" to target investment appropriately. It’s no easy task to get these incentives right, as Qiang Sun (Shandong University) and colleagues discuss in their study of China’s pharmaceutical policies. Government initiatives to reduce domestic drug spending and increase innovation have sometimes misfired, leading to unexpected market responses felt across the global village.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2008 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies