QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 28, no. 6 (2009): 1788-1798
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.1788
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Supplemental Exhibits
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Google Scholar
* Articles by Dror, D. M.
* Articles by Koren, R.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Dror, D. M.
* Articles by Koren, R.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Health Reform
* Insurance Coverage
* International Issues
* Business Of Health
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Insurance Market

MarketWatch

MARKETWATCH

Microinsurance: Innovations In Low-Cost Health Insurance

David M. Dror, Ralf Radermacher, Shrikant B. Khadilkar, Petra Schout, François-Xavier Hay, Arbind Singh and Ruth Koren

Microinsurance—low-cost health insurance based on a community, cooperative, or mutual and self-help arrangements—can provide financial protection for poor households and improve access to health care. However, low benefit caps and a low share of premiums paid as benefits—both designed to keep these arrangements in business—perversely limited these schemes’ ability to extend coverage, offer financial protection, and retain members. We studied three schemes in India, two of which are member-operated and one a commercial scheme, using household surveys of insured and uninsured households and interviews with managers. All three enrolled poor households and raised their use of hospital services, as intended. Financial exposure was greatest, and protection was least, in the commercial scheme, which imposed the lowest caps on benefits and where income was the lowest.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2009 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies