QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 25, no. 2 (2006): 532-540
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.532
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Artiga, S.
* Articles by Gaylin, D. S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Artiga, S.
* Articles by Gaylin, D. S.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Health Reform
* Managed Care - Medicaid
* Medicaid
* Business Of Health
* State/Local Issues
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues

DataWatch

Can States Stretch The Medicaid Dollar Without Passing The Buck? Lessons From Utah

Samantha Artiga, David Rousseau, Barbara Lyons, Stephen Smith and Daniel S. Gaylin

In 2002, Utah became the first state to reduce benefits and increase cost sharing for existing Medicaid beneficiaries, to finance a primary care benefit expansion for previously ineligible, low-income adults. Through a 2004 survey of beneficiaries, we found that expansion enrollees were predominantly poor and that most suffered from chronic conditions or disabilities, or both. Parents whose coverage was reduced to finance the expansion were extremely poor, were in poor health, and faced major financial challenges. Findings suggest that a coverage expansion approach that relies on savings from reducing coverage for current beneficiaries and solely covers primary care has important limitations.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
F. J. Thompson and C. Burke
Executive Federalism and Medicaid Demonstration Waivers: Implications for Policy and Democratic Process
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2007; 32(6): 971 - 1004.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2006 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies