Health Affairs, 23, no. 5 (2004): 210-216 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.210 © 2004 by Project HOPE	New Online   McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable   Geography & Reform   Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?   Siren Song of New GME   Public Plan Option: Pro & Con

This Article Figures Only Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Druss, B. G. Articles by Pincus, H. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Druss, B. G. Articles by Pincus, H. A. Related Collections Legal/Regulatory Issues Business Of Health Pharmaceuticals Chronic Care Health Spending

Health Tracking

MARKETWATCH

Listening To Generic Prozac: Winners, Losers, And Sideliners

This study tracks the diffusion of generic fluoxetine after its release in August 2001 within the largest U.S. pharmacy benefit manager (PBM). Within two weeks of the generic’s release, prescriptions exceeded those of brand-name Prozac. The main winners proved to be Barr Laboratories, the first entrant to the generic market; large purchasers, who reaped substantial cost savings after Barr’s period of exclusivity expired; and the PBM. The major loser was Eli Lilly, the manufacturer of Prozac. Consumers and makers of other antidepressants largely remained on the sidelines, with surprisingly little short-term impact evident from Prozac’s patent expiration.

                      What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Donohue Mental health in the medicare part d drug benefit: a new regulatory model? Health Aff., May 1, 2006; 25(3): 707 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]